Intellectual Property Update - September 2018

Intellectual Property Update - September 2018

Intellectual Property Update - September 2018

In this September update our IP team members highlight key recent issues.

A link to the web version of this email update is available here. If you would like to receive these updates via email, please subscribe.

Contact our experts for further advice

  1. Reposting: Is it copyright infringement?

    On 7 August 2018 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirmed that the reposting online of a photograph from another website, without the copyright owner’s consent, constitutes an infringement. This will be the case even if there were no... Read more
  2. Patent licensing - a recent High Court case highlights the limits of the exclusive jurisdiction and law clause

    Where a patent licence covers more than one country the royalty clause may provide for royalties to be paid for each country according to whether the licensed product would infringe the licensed patent(s) in that country. This reflects the fact that patents... Read more
  3. Individual was employee despite contract for services and intermediary personal service company

    In Sprint Electric Ltd v Buyer’s Dream & Another the High Court held that an individual was an employee rather than an independent contractor. This conclusion was reached despite the fact that the individual provided services to the company under... Read more
  4. Can an online rental and registration service for IP addresses rely on safe harbours?

    In a reference originating in Estonia the CJEU has held that the exemptions from liability in the eCommerce Directive (2000/31)  in respect of ‘mere conduit’, ‘caching’ and ‘hosting’ may, in principle, be relied on by... Read more
  5. European trade marks - Court of Justice raises the bar for distinctiveness based on use

    A ruling by the European Court of Justice (CJEU) in July 2018 confirmed that applicants trying to obtain an EU trade mark (EUTM) based on use must prove distinctiveness in every Member State. The ruling arose in connection with Nestlé’s four... Read more
  6. IP in a no-deal Brexit

    As the possibility of a ‘no deal’ Brexit continues to dominate the headlines, IP owners are increasingly focusing on contingency planning.  ‘No deal’ means that the UK would leave the EU at 11pm GMT on 29 March 2019 without a... Read more

Search our site